![]() ![]() ![]() (3) that Mary should have poured forth her costly spikenard, in royal self-forgetting love. ![]() took a position as a guest, like himself and (2) that Lazarus should have been one of those who sat at meat, reclined at table, with him, i.e. (1) that Martha should have shown her reverence by serving her Lord, according to her wont, not necessarily as hostess (Hengstenberg and Lange), but as the expression of her devoted thankfulness We wonder, with Godet, that Meyer should reject this simple supposition as "spurious harmony." All that is here stated is in agreement with it: At that table there would be seated two transcendent proofs of the power of Jesus to save, not only from the semblance but from the reality of death (see Meyer Matthew 26:6). John does not tell us in whose house "they made the dinner" or supper, and unless Simon the leper ( Matthew 26:6 and Mark 14:3) is a member of the family (or, as some suggest, the husband of Martha), we cannot suppose that it was in the quiet home of Bethany that this feast in honor of Jesus was held, but that it took place, as the synoptists positively declare, "in the house of Simon the leper." Simon may easily have been one of the many lepers whom our Lord had healed, and whose soul was filled with accordant gratitude. There, therefore, they made him a supper, and Martha served: but Lazarus was one of them that sat at the table with him. The meal is in his case, as afterwards in that of our Lord Himself ( Luke 24:41-43), a physical proof of the Resurrection and his presence by the side of our Lord calls forth from Mary the anointing, which testifies to her gratitude and love. It is closely connected with the statement of the preceding verse, “Lazarus had been dead, whom he raised from the dead.” Here was one sitting at meat with them who had lain in the sepulchre four days. Lazarus was one of them that sat at the table with him.-This is a natural touch answering to the impression that the fact made. John docs not define the place more definitely than to say that it was in Bethany but he alone adds the facts that Martha was still serving, and that Lazarus was present as a guest.Īnd Martha served.-The tense of this verb differs from that of the others in the verse, and implies the continued act of serving, whilst “made a feast” is the statement of the fact as a whole. Both the other accounts tell us that the supper was in the house of Simon the leper. Mark seems to place it two days before the Passover but comp. John, who was an eyewitness, will be noted. Notes on Matthew 26:6 et seq., and Mark 14:3 et seq., which are clearly accounts of the same supper. Ellicott's Commentary for English Readers(2) There they made him a supper.-Comp. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |